Field notes
Encounter profile
Identified using .
Species profile
Cyerce nigra
Identified using .
Photographic identification review
3/7 exact media auditedCyerce nigra
Probable assessment across 3 exact media items. The archive is currently filed as Cyerce nigra; a reviewed hypothesis is evidence, not a silent relabelling.
Archive ecology
SNAP observations, not the species’ full biological range.
Depth basis: 0 recorded, 6 profile-estimated, 1 contextual.
Consistent water window
7 observations with dive temperature sit within 25.0–25.0°C.
Recent encounters trend deeper
The recent-half median is 4.1m deeper than the earlier-half median. This is an archive pattern, not a population conclusion.
Indicative archive pattern · 7 observations / 3 dives
Creature trail
Species field guide
Field notes
Identified using .
Identification audit
6 assessments across 3 exact media items. Each records who reviewed the image, when, what they concluded, and why. These assessments remain separate from iNaturalist computer vision and from the current canonical Gallery label.

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 97% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation
Earlier audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 97% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 98% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation
Earlier audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 98% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 98% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation
Earlier audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 98% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: A closely related black-and-orange species with spotted cerata and a pale-orange margin
Comparison: The revision describes orange-yellow dots on both ceratal sides and different head/rhinophore markings, rather than C. nigra's spotted-versus-striped opposite faces
Why plausible: Another black-and-orange member of the revised complex that can resemble C. nigricans externally
Comparison: It has two transverse orange head patches and scattered rhinophore-margin spots and does not supply the complete opposite-face pattern visible here
Why plausible: The 2025 revision documents substantial cryptic and pseudocryptic diversity across the genus
Comparison: Radula, reproductive anatomy and multilocus sequence evidence would provide confirmation
Archive
7 media items
Optional context
Continue exploring
Species photographed on the same dives come first, followed by close taxonomic neighbours.





